Read more about Cyberpunk 2077➜ https://cyberpunk2077.mgn.tv
Cyberpunk 2077 is a vast game and I soaked into it heavily.
Durng playthrough I a decent number of locations which they seems to be perfect for graphics comparison of Ray Tracing ON vs OFF. Are you ready?
Gameplay (Maxed out settings in 4K) captured on PC with following specs:
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition: https://www.nvidia.com/pl-pl/shop/geforce/gpu/?page=1&limit=9&locale=pl-pl&category=GPU&gpu=RTX%203080
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: https://amzn.to/3dUo7dl
MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI https://amzn.to/2YTXb9y
G.SKILL 16GB (2x8GB) 3200MHz CL16 Ripjaws V Black
https://amzn.to/2YXPPlv
Looking for RTX Graphics Cards? Check on Amazon: https://amzn.to/3dzcGYZ
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Cyckiewicz
Find me on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Cycu1YT/
#Cyberpunk2077 #RTX3080 #RTXON
source
Reflection on raytrace is new fature of nvidia driver scam that turn of indriver advanced reflection for non RTX cards , anader reason to change to ATI gpu or suffer for owner nvidia gpu pride !
Is this a person "ADAM" from Deus Ex on 1:30???? LOL
Fake
I know Cyberpunk has a lot of flaws, but the fact that a lot of comments talk about how there's not much difference (except the glass corridor) says a lot about the amazing job they did with the lightning
avid gamer for 30 years, I honestly can't see appreciable difference, plus i don't like this game graphics either with or without ray tracing
Honestly this game is one of the most beautiful and best out there . Leave all the bugs aside , some of y'all dont know how hard it is to make a game like this ❤️
I do have a rtx 2060 benchmark on cyberpunk on my channel .
Это единственная игра где есть что-то типа rtx без карты для этого просто браво разработчикам за это что дали возможность поиграть в кибер панк хоть с освещением как с rtx браво
WOW the diffrence is huge
Jep. I'm selling my 3080.
I would be better off with the cash, trust me, the game looks perfect without RTX and the performance on 1080Ti wasn't that bad actually.
I laugh when people say RTX has MINOR impact on picture quality.
The non-raytracing setting sems to be unfairly low – more than just the "RTX" was disabled to make the difference pop, e.g the reflection quality can be better even without it. The last scene proves this point – the palm trees don't move in the non-raytraced settings, meaning that the settings are likely lower overall.
I noticed the biggest visual improvement in afterlife.. everything pops more and the lighting bouncing off the glass looks incredible outside of that and maybe puddles/roads generally you rarely see that much of a difference not enough to explain the performance hit. I’d take the 30+ fps any day over a slight graphical improvement
Lol this is a waste of money and resources.
3:16 The jacket looks LESS realistic with RTX on
0;41 where is this place can anyone tell me?
I see how much fps drops when rtx on . It's horrible
Static lighting < dynamic lighting
Ok I have to say this
This game is very beautiful
I am playing in rtx 2060
And this is one of the best game I have ever played
It may not look very different but it already gives much more depth and naturality. It's much bigger step than it looks. On GTX cards there was no chance for RT, on RTX 20xx a single RT technic could slaughter the performance, on RTX 30xx series we have multiple RT technics and it still keep up with FPS. Imagine how games will look like in few years on 40xx or 50xx generation when games will be build entirely to support RT. And when all light in game will be made of RT… Also AMD and consoles supports RT now so it will only get better and better in future.
RTX ON FPS OFF
I have a RX6900XT Reference and a RTX3090 Founders here. And I don’t think, the Nvidia card is 500 Euro more… worth it
Ray tracing is nice but barely noticeable in a lot of cases and definitely not worth the performance penalty.
Some scenes are better done with RT but look better without RT.
What is noticeable is the drastic drop in FPS with RT.
For the light refraction in glass 1:05, shadow colors 2:30, and especially for water reflections 3:42, it looks great. I couldn't catch any considerable difference for highlighted and mid areas though 4:20, 1:30