Read more about Cyberpunk 2077➜ https://cyberpunk2077.mgn.tv
AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.1 vs. Nvidia DLSS Quality. Performance and visuals comparison between AMD FSR 2.1 and Nvidia DLSS.
Ultra Graphics Preset. 1440p.
● GPU: Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GAMING OC 8GB GDDR6
● CPU: Intel Core i7-8700K 4.4GHz, Hexa Core, 12 Threads / Coffee Lake
● Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON
● RAM: G.Skill Trident Z RGB DDR4 16GB (2x8GB) 3000MHz CL16
source
Hey! Maybe the video is too short, but straight to the point.
I also created a simpler and more attractive OSD that only measures GPU performance.
And, of course, more understandable for many people.
DLSS is better.
ty wolfi keep it up
Dlss way better , fsr giving shimmering effects.
zommm ;p
Goof stuff. I was wondering last night which should I choose, I did have amd fsr 2.1 in high performance. Was getting 60fps in cyberpunk at around 3200@ 2100 resolution. I just worry about my frame rates, as long as not choppy..and visuals look crisp I'm good.
beeindruckend, mit welchem technischen abstand doch amd eingestiegen ist, aber dennoch relativ gut softwareseitig nvidia einholt 🙂 ist zwar immer noch nicht perfekt, aber dennoch zu gebrauchen und für amd karten und alten nvidias gut!
Ultra Graphics Preset, 1440p.
very bad, amd
Надо было ещё протестировать на AMD GPU
Show us how FSR works on Radeon. Here you had a GeForce.
Well fsr doesn't need a hardware like tensorcores
love the new overlay look. always creative and different from other benchmarks. thanks wolfgod
Wolfgang, what sharpening did you use? I'm seeing that using it at around 0.20 gives the best result and fixes the shimmering problem shown in the video.
Dlss is better
i really want to know how to make those fps overlays. Is it in MSI afterburner but how ?
DLSS == FSR. DLSS is smoothing + scaling. If we compare then DLSS and FSR + Temporary Anti-Aliasing. This will be correct.
DLSS only works on RTX cards. FSR on everything. They both look the same. For me, FSR is better.
AMD always behind Nvidia…🤦♂
love the new overlay look. Any chance to share .ovl?
DLSS image is better
Nvidia wins
DLSS is much better for RTX Cards but without a RTX Card is FSR a good Option of course DLSS is only available on RTX cards😉
FSR looks trash in this game
I don't know why people compare these, they are totally different technologies. Spatial upscaling v hardware tensor cores.
Pretty horible shimmering on FSR side…Devs did poor job.
I am not quite sure about it, but when playing on 1080P, the FSR with 0.5 Sharpness give better and more clear image such as far away building compared to dlss 0.05 sharpness.
It looks like you used a high sharpening setting for FSR, turn it down because the default is bad.
DLSS looks better, but FSR does a pretty good job and is "open" and can be used by other GPU's. Kudos to that.
you earned a sub. simple comparison.
Interesting to see how dlss is not that better than fsr2.1 knowing that dlss uses specific cores made for it, inside Nvidia gpus while fsr is being calculated by the same cores that rendering the game graphics. Dlss looks and performs better nevertheless those differences are not that huge as we may spect for a dedicated cores
Please, make a comparison of 1080p Native, vs 1440p DLSS Quality/Balanced vs 4k DLSS Ultra Performance (maybe with help of DSR/DLDSR)
Good test
Did you lost 2k subs cause I remember you did have 171K Subs
Fsr for 80% of players
It's big progress with FSR! There are still some strange artifacts sometimes, but fps are almost same as DLSS! And this is working on all GPUs!
AMD is kicking ass. it maybe hard to understand how from this clip but, keep in mind DLSS needs to be trained, it requires a data set before it can be engaged. FSR does not, FSR is a drop in solution that does all of the work at a driver level.
This makes AMD's solution available to all venders with no need for AMD to participate, unlike nvidia closed source solution that requires Nvidia's participation.
AMD's solution could be added to older games easily, and doesn't require AMD's approval, nor special hardware… This makes it possible to use FSR to optimize for low end hardware. This will give our aging GPU's a second lease on life, and AMD being device agnostic means this will benefit all gamers, not just those on AMD GPU's.
It's a big win for everyone
DLSS is way better in terms of quality, especially in 0:42
FSR 2.1 luck much better then the 2.0 can't wait for the new FSR 3.0 in2023
both look ugly to my eyes
FSR 2.2 it was better. can be activated with a mod on the 1.6. Obviously you can't anymore
FSR 2.1 for a technology that does not require special video card resources, this is an excellent technology.
Fsr wins imo because it open and was something they just wanted to add and test is very impressive dlss had years but amd started to figure stuff out