Cyberpunk 2077 4K No DLSS! Asus Strix RTX 4090 W/ i9 13900KF CPU @ 5.7GHz All-Core OC Raw GPU Power



Read more about Cyberpunk 2077➜ https://cyberpunk2077.mgn.tv

In the majority of this video I test out Cyberpunk 2077 at 4K without DLSS Assist on (cheating in some respects), I also towards the end of the video briefly test 8K with DLSS and a little 4K. My Asus Strix RTX 4090 was running a lot hotter than usual in this video as my room was pretty warm with the heat on, and was also playing the new Flight Simulator 40th anniversary patch game before making this recording. For CPU, I’m running an i9 13900KF @ 5.7 Ghz All-core OC, with 32 GB of G.Skill Z5 PC 6400 DDR5 memory.

I should also note I am using the new 16 pin dedicated PCI-E 5.0 cable now from Seasonic to power my Asus Strix RTX 4090, and I may be wrong, but looks like with this cable the card is pulling a little more wattage now, which also may be a factor in why my card was running so hot. Normally my load temperatures with this GPU in closed case at these OC settings are usually 58-63C, but given the higher ambient temperatures in my room, and previous game playing, and none use of DLSS maybe have all contributed to the higher than normal temperatures in this particular video of mine.

source

19 thoughts on “Cyberpunk 2077 4K No DLSS! Asus Strix RTX 4090 W/ i9 13900KF CPU @ 5.7GHz All-Core OC Raw GPU Power”

  1. Time Stamps:
    4K Max Ultra / Psycho settings DLSS OFF: 0:01
    4K Max Ultra / Psycho settings DLSS OFF: Jig Jig Street: 5:04
    4K Max Ultra / Psycho settings DLSS OFF: Driving at night to After Life: 7:45
    4K Max Ultra / Psycho settings DLSS OFF: After Life: 8:54
    4K Max Ultra / Psycho settings DLSS OFF: Driving at night: 12:14
    8K Max Ultra / Psycho settings DLSS On Quality mode driving at night: 13:27
    4K Max Ultra / Psycho settings DLSS On Quality mode driving at night: 15:36
    And this is with the latest 1.61 patch.

    In the majority of this video I test out Cyberpunk 2077 at 4K without DLSS Assist on (cheating in some respects), I also towards the end of the video briefly test 8K with DLSS and a little 4K. My Asus Strix RTX 4090 was running a lot hotter than usual in this video as my room was pretty warm with the heat on, and was also playing the new Flight Simulator 40th anniversary patch game before making this recording. For CPU, I'm running an i9 13900KF @ 5.7 Ghz All-core OC, with 32 GB of G.Skill Z5 PC 6400 DDR5 memory.

    I should also note I am using the new 16 pin dedicated PCI-E 5.0 cable now from Seasonic to power my Asus Strix RTX 4090, and I may be wrong, but looks like with this cable the card is pulling a little more wattage now, which also may be a factor in why my card was running so hot. Normally my load temperatures with this GPU in closed case at these OC settings are usually 58-63C, but given the higher ambient temperatures in my room, and previous game playing, and none use of DLSS maybe have all contributed to the higher than normal temperatures in this particular video of mine.

    Reply
  2. This game is absolutely brutal. It’s even more demanding than games like Watch Dogs Legion, Dying Light 2, and Control. We will need the 5090 to run this at a stable 60 FPS at native 4K Psycho settings with Psycho RT.

    Reply
  3. i have an inno3d RTX 4090 OC.
    mine runs at a wattage that varies between 380 and 425 , never more.
    using MSi afterburner i left my clock speed at 2900mhz since that is whats more stable for my card.
    the ram is 32 gb of ddr4 aorus ram cl18 at 4200mhz.
    my cpu is ryzen 7 5800X3D oc to 4800mhz
    water cooled by an NZXT kraken z53
    and the motherboard is an asus x570 pro wifi

    So safe to say that while it is a very high end set up. a bit over 3000€
    It`s a whole tier behind yours , specially on the cpu department.

    yet the 4k native fps seem to be very close if not identical to mine. Im aware that in more competitive games, that reach high fps, the better cpu+ram combo willgo higher before reaching cpu bottlencek, but then again, at what point do fps barely matter?
    for me 4k being maxed out at 144hz at the moment ( for 99.999999% of the monitors)
    isn`t a problem , because once past 120/130 fps image is so fluid that it feels like, can you honestly tell the difference in fps?…

    wich leaves me thinking. Outside of enthusiast building /testing.
    Is it really worth it to go all out, even for future proofing?

    i fell the way the market is going , the best FUTURE PROOFING build is:

    GPU: go as high end as you can afford, because thats the most punished component, so even a 4090 (ultra high end) can be sensible for future proofing.
    CPU: medium-high end/high end , 12 and 13th gen i7 or 5800x/5800XD/7700X
    RAM: meidum end and ddr4 above 3800mhz or any ddr5 period. and i´d go for 32 just in case.
    Motherboard: the cheapest one , thats compatible with all your components nad has conections for all your things.
    PSU:1000W 80 plus gold
    cpu cooler: any high end tower air cooler does a fantastic job for acceptable money right now, Noctua is specially amazing.

    Reply
  4. And they say the 4090 is overkill 😂. You’ll need at least a 4090 for path traced games. The 4090 is not overkill if you want full on ray tracing/path tracing for the game, even at 2K.

    Reply

Leave a Comment