Which was Worse? Cyberpunk 2077 or Fallout 76?



Read more about Cyberpunk 2077➜ https://cyberpunk2077.mgn.tv

#Cyberpunk #Fallout76 #CDProjektRed

Cyberpunk 2077 was a disaster in many ways, but could it have been worse? In this video I compare and contrast the trailers, launches, bugs, glitches and developer responses of both Cyberpunk and Fallout 76 to decide…who was worse?

Patreon: Even 1 dollar helps support my dream 😀
https://www.patreon.com/PaprikaDota
Twitch:
https://www.twitch.tv/paprikaahh
Twitter
https://twitter.com/Paprika_Gaming
Discord
https://discord.gg/XsCYqnM

source

46 thoughts on “Which was Worse? Cyberpunk 2077 or Fallout 76?”

  1. I will say after the latest Cyberpunk patch, the game is up to industry standards now. It’s FAR from perfect and has issues deeply imbedded in it to the point it’ll take a massive overhaul or a completely new game to change but as it stands, the game would probably sit at a 6-7/10 for me as far as a rating.

    The best I think Cyberpunk could ever achieve is probably a 8/10 in my eyes but I can see that they are at least making a valiant effort to improve the game as much as they can.

    Fallout 76 just sucks, Wastelanders and the story DLC’s are all great games taped onto a piece of shit.

    Reply
  2. I’ve played Fallout 76 since it launched, and it wasn’t really the glitch’s that ticked a lot of gamers off (all previous Fallout games also had lots of bugs). It was the complete lack of NPCs, which was something that was advertised pre launch, so the gamers made a big stink about the bugs instead (which were practically a staple of the entire franchise lol). This was proven when the wastelanders update brought in NPCs and more traditional Fallout storytelling. Even through the game was still pretty buggy, a lot of gamers who previously bashed it started to like it lol. Btw I enjoyed the game throughout, and no I do not work for Bethesda or know anyone who does (wasn’t payed by them either lol). I hear Cyberpunk was practically unplayable for Xbox one and PlayStation four users, (which were most console users at the time), so at least Fallout 76 was a playable game on all platforms.

    Reply
  3. Im glad i never bought FO76 at launch because i play with gamepass since last year and i love it, sure it fucking sucks sometimes because servers are shit and theres not much to do in the endgame but still, is a solid game now

    Reply
  4. Played cyberpunk as PCMR and it was a great experience. Still a game breaking bug in my safe that bothers me (one side mission is not completeable which is very bad for a completionist). I have a folder full of bug videos lmao. What really grinded my gears was the car trailer. I made you believe there would be different cars for different jobs, like a big car can crash through walls others can't etc. In the end cars were only used for sightseeing, I mean the game just looks awesome.

    Reply
  5. You know, at least Fallout 76 added content over the years and managed to win a lot of people back and even brought in new fans. It's been almost 2 years with almost nothing and there's already rumors that Cyberpunk will abandon ship after the first DLC..

    Reply
  6. In my opinion cyber punk was the worst out of the two.., I didn’t buy either of these games I knew 76 was gonna flop but I didn’t see as much hype for it as I did cyber punk which I also thought was so overrated that it would flop.
    They marketed this as THE NEXT BIG BREAK IN GAMING HISTORY FEATURING JOHN WHICK They had hyped themselves up for years and already had a die hard fan base only to just do SOOO bad

    Reply
  7. You forgot to mention the extra special offer that Bethesda came up with for fallout 76 pay them an extra 100 pounds UK or dollars us for private servers that weren't private and which contained world's that had already been cleaned out by game hoppers and as a special customer you got special assets that were only available to subscribers that stole all your junk and gear if you used them

    Reply
  8. Played both on PC.
    I bought cyberpunk on release played the crap out of it I have nearly 500hrs I can count on one hand's finger the times I encountered game breaking bugs or crashes.
    A friend bought me fallout 76 a couple weeks ago I have 46hrs on it ( no I don't have social life ) since then I've had to restart the game countless times because I get soft locked when entering power armor, the game hangs constantly despite me playing on a 10700k with an rtx 2070 and 32gb of ram @3600mhz which is more than enough power to run that friggin game.
    I've gotten more frustrated playing Fallout 76 over the last two weeks then the nearly 2 years I've been playing cyberpunk 2077

    Now I know last gen consoles havehad problems running the game but what can you expect from consoles that can't run GTA online, a launch title, at a playable frame rate. Cyberpunk had no business being on last gen

    Reply
  9. The difference between the two games is that one was at least somewhat playable on PC when it launched, while the other was a bad experience across the board. If Cyberpunk had at least three more years in the oven and only shipped to next-gen consoles, I don't think things would have gone down the way they did. Most people don't have gaming PCs, so I sympathize with the crowd that sees it as an abject failure. I like the game; it's the best damn 7/10 I've ever played. But a 7 is still a 7, and far from what many of us were hoping it would be. Fallout, though? Yikes. Even if it had more years in development, I still don't think it would have been that compelling. At least the headlines it generated damn-near weekly were interesting.

    Reply
  10. 76 is a far worst game. Cyberpunk atleast is a still intresting game with an intresting environment and characters that you will love and want to die for. 76 is just copypaste fallout 4. No human characters ai upon release just empty everything. Cyberpunk had legit effort put in not 76

    Reply

Leave a Comment