DLSS 3 vs DLSS 2 vs Native 4K in Cyberpunk 2077 – Graphics and FPS Comparison

by



Read more about Cyberpunk 2077➜ https://cyberpunk2077.mgn.tv

Cyberpunk 2077 : DLSS 3 vs DLSS 2 vs Native 4K | RTX 4090

Buy games at the best prices on gamivo.com – https://gvo.deals/TestingGames
Use coupon code and get discount – TG3

System:
Windows 11
Core i9-13900K – https://bit.ly/3SgY3xf
ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming – https://bit.ly/3scEZpc
G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB 32GB DDR5 6000MHz – http://bit.ly/3XlBGdU
CPU Cooler – be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4 – http://bit.ly/35G5atV
GeForce RTX 4090 24GB – https://bit.ly/3CSaMCj
SSD – 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB – https://bit.ly/2NmWeQe
Power Supply CORSAIR HX Series HX1200 1200W – https://bit.ly/3EZWtNj

source

28 thoughts on “DLSS 3 vs DLSS 2 vs Native 4K in Cyberpunk 2077 – Graphics and FPS Comparison”

  8. I have a 4070 ti with a LG C2 42 inches… The framerate at 4K wasn't that good with all details at maximum settings in the games… DLSS 3 was a true gamechanger… From poor fps to a lot fps… Best technology ever

    Reply

  17. DLSS3 is amazing.

    If it can do 4K120, any new title game in the future will have no frame rate problems at 1080p.

    If you buy an RTX4090 and play at 1080p, you won't have to replace it for at least 10 years.

    If you think of it as an investment, the 4090 seems cheap. It's a wonder.

    Reply

  18. notice the CPU usage temps and wattage, it seems to have an inverse effect. although there is more stress in the benchmark for DLSS 2. Not dissing the tech choom, just seeing a correlation.

    Reply

  20. The difference between Native and DLSS in graphic quality is almost noting and yes the raw horsepower of the 4090 helps get 40fps native rendering however other RTX cards get less than that but can still post similar DLSS frame rates as the 4090 while still looking amazing that is what makes worth having

    Reply

  21. …are you sure this is a 4090???? I get ~60fps in cyberpunk at 4K max settings with max ray tracing with DLSS 2 on an RTX3080, I have a really hard time believing a 4090 is only 10fps better lol

    Reply

  24. im so tired of these people keep complain and tell these tech "Fake" frame.Like bro,how the fuck is it fake if it actually did what it intended to do which is give your more frame.Shit even if it fake it still make your game run better,40-60 fps increase is no joke and despite that 5-10ms latency incease from this it still way too good and not even noticeable,go buy a damn 4000 card and try it yourself before dissing something that you are not even own

    Reply

  25. remember when pc player mock console for upscaling "lmao thats not real 4k" "its not real resolution" yeah me neither

    but then dlss and fsr coming suddenly everyone loses their mind

    Reply

  27. A couple key notes about DLSS 3
    1. Its more akin to "frame hallucination" rather than fps booster. Your response time depends on the base fps rate, so if your original fps was low the game will feel sluggish (This is really bad for comp games where latency matters)
    2. Currently there are many garbled frames generated and these are very noticeable and immersion breaking. Hopefully with time (and possibly Gsync) this issue will be minimized.
    3. "DLSS 3" is honestly not a good name as it is different to DLSS 2. DLSS 2 upscales a low res image and outputs a higher res one. "DLSS 3" generates entire new frames.
    TLDR DLSS 3 is currently only good for when the base fps (Native Resolution/ DLSS turned off) is already high (90+fps is where DLSS 3 can really shine).

    Reply

Leave a Comment