Cyberpunk 2077 PC Tested On Xbox One CPU… And It Works!



Read more about Cyberpunk 2077➜ https://cyberpunk2077.mgn.tv

Cyberpunk 2077 on PC… tested on an Xbox One CPU? Yes, it’s possible – just. Last year, a PC motherboard with an embedded Xbox One processor appeared in Far Eastern markets. It’s the first time we’ve been able to run Windows on a last-gen console APU, so just what level of gaming performance can we achieve from it? And if we run Cyberpunk 2077’s PC version on a console CPU, how does it actually compare to the console version itself? So began a lengthy journey that only recently reached a conclusion.

Logitech Lightspeed Wireless sponsors Digital Foundry. Step up to the pro-grade communications and precision audio you need to win, all with the freedom and mobility of LIGHTSPEED wireless.

Buy the Logitech G502 Lightspeed Wireless mouse here:
US – https://g.logi.link/8dk97
UK – https://g.logi.link/lvenh

Subscribe for more Digital Foundry: http://bit.ly/DFSubscribe

Join the DF Patreon to support the team more directly and to get access to everything we do via pristine quality downloads: https://bit.ly/3jEGjvx

Want some DF-branded tee-shirts, mugs, hoodies or pullovers? Check out our store: https://bit.ly/2BqRTt0

source

48 thoughts on “Cyberpunk 2077 PC Tested On Xbox One CPU… And It Works!”

  1. I would love to see some xbox or ps4 genuine marketing on this. "We employed most fastest and greatest cpu available specificaly carefully selected from our greatest potatoe fields. Matching 2007 era big boys cpu's(mostly). Clocking to insane 1.75ghz our grrrrreat potatoe line cpu will bring pre-last generation gaming to the next generation gaming…." And imagine all this add being voiced by Scottish farmer. 😀

    Reply
  2. 3D Mark has a PCIe Bandwidth Test by now. Maybe that would've helped.
    Helped me finding out that my USB PCIe Card, socketet in my 2nd PCIe x16 slot made my grafics card only run at PCIe x8 Speeds.

    Reply
  3. Those developers should receive some commendations or something for making a miracle for games to run on those slow ass hardware.

    The Xbox 360 CPU was far more superior but it was basically a supercomputer IBM chip manufactured by Intel. It also had a discrete ATI graphics chip but still even with an older generation GPU the CPU faired better.

    I bet the PS3's architecture was just as bad in comparison to these APUs. The PS3 had a CPU codename CELL made by Intel and IBM and because the architecture was new and odd the game Developers were basically struggling to make the games run on it. It was a disaster.

    Reply
  4. Cyberpunk 2077 is not optimised! compare the game with another gargantuan open-word game: Red Dead Redemption 2. What Rockstar has achieved on that game is a masterpiece of optimization.

    Reply
  5. That is for these purely academic testing videos. Though I’ll never consider using the board now, it is nice to see them being benchmarked as best they can be.

    Reply
  6. Interesting video whilst also strange that this board config has appeared now when it's an obsolete design now !?!?

    On a different note…..I was wondering if you will be doing your vigorous testing on the New Wireless Headphones that Microsoft are releasing for Xbox on March 16th for $99 as I'd be Very Interested in your Thoughts, Findings and Results about them !?!?

    Reply
  7. I dont have real numbers, so I'll say that 99% of games require good single core performance. Anything above 3.0Ghz with 4 cores is good for older games and anything above 4.0Ghz and has atleast 8 cores is future proofed for atleast 4 years.

    Reply
  8. Okay, here's a thought: now you basically have an Xbone cpu in your hands for testing, I'd be interested to see if there's any wacky homebrew out there that can really stress this to breaking point. Of course, I'd love to see Hitman 3 running on it, and the obligatory CORRIDOR OF DOOM, but it'd be interesting to see how it handles all the curious weirdness that probably exists for this.

    Also, Flight Sim 2020, Dwarf Fortress, and an attempt at Crysis mass physics would be fun, just to see the cpu totally melt.

    Finally, I'd be interested to see it up against FX8350 or whatever the highest end of the Bulldozer stack was, and see if a bulldozer-based console would have been better, or even possible when last gen consoles came out.

    Reply
  9. I’m sorry, but the Logitech ads everywhere, but no links to buy the board that’s the subject of the video is enough for me. I’ve tried to hang on but you guys have turned into shills. Good luck and Godspeed.

    Reply
  10. we knew from the beggining those CPUs in PS4 a x1 were actually a downgrade from the previous generation. I remember when Kazunory Yamauchi said in 2014 that PS4 has a stronger GPU but the Cell cpu in PS3 was soo fast ( meaning its pretty shi t in PS4 in comparision ). Comparing 1,6ghz Jagur VS 3,5Ghz Zen 2 is just insane leap in performance.

    Reply
  11. Interesting video!

    I believe you should put unified memory as a minus, having split memory pools avoids contention when CPU/GPU needs some resources simultaneously. This is true assuming you have enough of both obviously.

    Reply
  12. I would love to see Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 running on the cpu since the console version is only for Series X&S. Obviously it shouldn't release on Xbox One consoles considering the game is heavy on the cpu, but I'm just curious.

    Reply
  13. 16:42 I'm saying that for few months. It's really a miracle that consoleboys are even able to pass through start button lol, not to mention even play game at 14-25fps with junk like ps4. They should be happy. I remember in 2000-2005 even on like 2-5 years old pc we've got black screen on new games and no one was complaining – your pc is old, go upgrade. And those modern consoleboys – oh noo cp2077 running with dips on my 10 years old ps4 which has hardware 15 year old, lol I can't believe it)

    P.s I have ps4pro and not complaining, I just understand that I have to pay more to get more

    Reply

Leave a Comment