Cyberpunk 2077 Asus Strix RTX 4090 & i9 13900KF 1080p, 1440P 4K, & 8K Max settings W Max Overclock



Read more about Cyberpunk 2077➜ https://cyberpunk2077.mgn.tv

So the audio commentary issue is finally solved now that I got an actual real headset meant for gaming, the microphone is a little on the high side I noticed, but with further tweaking, I’ll make some adjustments. This is test Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080, 1440p, 4K, and 8K with my Asus Strix RTX 4090 @ 3,090 MHZ OC, and i9 13900KF at 5.7 GHZ all Core OC.

source

25 thoughts on “Cyberpunk 2077 Asus Strix RTX 4090 & i9 13900KF 1080p, 1440P 4K, & 8K Max settings W Max Overclock”

  1. Cyberpunk 2077 with my Asus Strix RTX 4090 @ 3,090 MHZ OC, and i9 13900KF at 5.7 GHZ all Core OC.
    Time Stamps:
    4K Max / Psycho settings DLSS off 0:47
    4K Max / Phsycho settings DLSS off: 2:06
    1080P Max Psycho Settings DLSS on
    3:05
    1080P Max Pyscho settings DLSS off: 3:42
    4K Max / Psycho settings DLSS off: 4:28
    8K Max / Psycho settings DLSS Quality: 5:04
    8K Max Pyscho settings DLSS Balanced 5:57
    8K Max Psycho settings DLSS performance: 6:20
    8K Max Pyscho settings DLSS Ultra performance: 6:44

    Reply
  2. I don't quite get it. How come in these videos 1080p looks so blurry and 4K looks clear, but on my screen 1080p looks crystal clear, better than the 4K in the videos?

    Reply
  3. Thank you! Has been waiting for this combination of 4090 and 13900. It's a bit disappointing to see even overclocked, the CPU couldn't help push the FPS much. The game is just THAT taxing on GPU, I guess.

    Reply
  4. Would be really interesting to see if with the 600W VBIOS the GPU would pull the performance upwards. Another 150W to play with could be what the 4090 needs to run 8k at 30 FPS. The game looks killer though at 8k. Just incredible.

    Reply
  5. Damn, the temp your air cooled 4090 is even lower than my liquid cooled 4090, what's the secret? I mean I know the 4090 series are pretty cool because larger cooler but around 55 in Cyberpunk 2077? I saw many reviewes, most of them were at 60ish at least!

    Reply

Leave a Comment