Starfield VS Cyberpunk 2077 Release Comparison



Read more about Cyberpunk 2077➜ https://cyberpunk2077.mgn.tv

If you like my videos Please subscribe.I appreciate all of you!

SUBSCRIBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TribbianiJoseph/videos
Backup channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwi62GG5EB3dglACZBiSl1A

Timestamps:
0:00 NPCs Reaction
0:41 Glass Physics
1:28 Water Physics
2:26 Swimming
2:42 Cops Reaction
3:02 Fire Physics
3:17 Climbing Ladder
3:37 Vegetation Interaction
3:53 Map Details
4:17 Destruction Physics
4:41 Nightclub Details

#starfield #cyberpunk2077

source

49 thoughts on “Starfield VS Cyberpunk 2077 Release Comparison”

  1. I would say both games at launch starfield wins because it was actually stable and playable. With cyberpunk you could always tell there was something special underneath the technical disaster, while starfield just feels alright. How ever after playing starfield and then playing phantom liberty i did not put cyberpunk down for a minute. If I was pitching both games to someone I was say cyberpunk is a must play, and starfield I would ask them how much they like Bethesda games.

    Reply
  2. To me the nightclub comparisons say it all: Starfield's looks like it was designed by a bunch of ageing nerds who've never stepped foot in a club, while Cyberpunk's looks like the designers actually did.

    Reply
  3. Looks like I'll just keep playing Morrowind and Stalker. I finally got a computer that can run anything on ultra settings for the foreseeable future but there's not really any games worth buying for it.

    Reply
  4. People really forget how bad cyberpunk was at launch. I played both games on release. Cyberpunk had so many game breaking bugs, tons of unfinished content, placeholder textures and it crashes so many times I've lost count. I couldn't stand playing it after a few hours. I only started playing it again after the 1.6 update. My friend couldn't even get it to run smoothly on his base ps4. Even Sony removed it from the PS store because a lot of of people tried to get a refund because of bad it is.

    Starfield only had performance issues at launch and I only encountered 2 bugs and only crashed once in my 50 hours of gameplay.

    Reply
  5. Starfield is so dogshit day 1 Cyberpunk is still better, let that sink in lmao. To think people spent money for that trash and still defend it just because of the bethesda brand.

    Reply
  6. i love space setting
    that nasapunk, oof, i was so exited
    and in the other hand I dont like cyberpunk stories
    I watched ghost in the shell or Alita or bladerunner and was like meeeh (gunnm manga is the goat btw love it)

    I was not expecting anything from CP77 when i launched it 1 year ago
    but OMG I'm so in love with that game now its just insane
    big W for CDPR
    I respect them a lot for not disappearing but finishing their game after all these years

    and starfield…
    I'm a big fan of morrowind yk
    just no comments
    sorry bethesda but it's a shame

    Reply
  7. bethesda is just a talentless and poorly lead development studio…. only thing keeping them viable is they made such a robust and good game more than 12 years ago and now they have fans that think a "bethesda rpg" is a thing that should be expected.

    Reply
  8. Wanna know the real comparison?
    CDPR themselves acknowledged that their game is buggy , unfinished,offered refund , promised they will fix it(which they did), apologized WHEREAS Todd says its a "its a next gen" pc game ,its amazing , it has lots of things going on , if you are facing problems stop being poor and upgrade your pc.😂

    Reply
  9. After watch a lot of these starfield vs cyberpunk videos and comments, a lot of Bethesda fanboys like to say "It took Cyberpunk 3 years to fix and patch while starfield just got released, its not fair to compare." What they fail to realize is that after 3 years, Bethesda will do what they do best, re-release the same shit with the same bugs rather than fixing it because they know modder will do it for free. Meanwhile CDPR actually did a lot in the past 3 years.

    Bethesda up coming "NEW" game :
    Starfield : Special Edition
    Starfield : VR
    Starfield : Anniversary Edition ( It took them 10+years in skyrim to add fishing which is completely useless so probably after 10 years they will add a coffee holder next to your pilot seat in AE version and sell the same game to you again)

    Reply
  10. Well, at least in Cyberpunk 2077 was a good and heartbreaking story, interesting dialogues and characters, as well as the stunning design of the city…. Ah yes, also Cyberpunk 2077 has no downloading screens between locations and missions.

    And also Cyberpunk 2077 was fixed, which will never happen with Starfield.

    Reply
  11. I didn’t want to pick a side,but cyberpunk 1.5 which released in 2022 can run smoothly on steam deck while Starfield doesn’t run. Can poor optimization be fixed though, I mean Witcher 3 doesn’t run this smoothly as cp2077 did, so idk, at least cdpr fixes the game

    Reply
  12. Imagine cyberpunk as a steak from a newbie/toddler. its bad, its burned and tastes pretty bad, but its still a steak made with a great meat. with time CD fixed that steak and made it almost perfect. But Starfield is a turd. With time there will be mods, fixes etc. Yeah it will be better than before, but its still a shit. Cyberpunk had story, world, characters. Starfield has nothing

    Reply
  13. I played Starfield for 160 hours. I had some entertaining moments but overall it was a bland, boring and unoffensive experience. There's absolutely no edge at all to the game.

    Reply
  14. Started Starfield trough gamepass PC and its okay, not bad but not good either, story is a bit meh and my biggest problem is performance, Cyberpunk is great now and runs very well on my rx6600 while Starfield with it's way less impressive graphics runs a lot worse than CP2077. Bethesda fucked up a bit.

    Reply

Leave a Comment