Starfield or Cyberpunk 2077? #Starfield #Cyberpunk2077 #Gaming



Read more about Cyberpunk 2077➜ https://cyberpunk2077.mgn.tv

Prefer Starfield or Cyberpunk 2077?

#LukeStephensTV #LukeStephensLIVE #Streamer
#Starfield #Cyberpunk2077 #Bethesda #CDProjektRed #Gaming #Xbox #PS5

source

35 thoughts on “Starfield or Cyberpunk 2077? #Starfield #Cyberpunk2077 #Gaming”

  1. It took 3 years for cyberpunk to reach this state. Starfield is going to be the way it is til the end of time. A streamer ran into the merchant chest bug/exploit. The same one from skyrim. The one that Bethesda never fixed. Modders fixed it. I honestly would take launch cyberpunk over starfield. I enjoyed the story more, the characters more, the world more. And I had more hope that cdpr would fix things than bethesda.

    Reply
  2. The devs at CDPR take the trophy, but the marketing doesn't.

    Now, we have to acknowledge that Cyberpunk 2077, in its current state, is probably better than all but a couple games in 2023. Had it released this year, it would've been easily in the discussion for GOTY.

    Let's hope CDPR learns that it's better to release later, and in a better state. Let's also hope that Larian is seen as an example of that. Yes, Act 3 is problematic, but the game was more solid than almost any other current AAA release.

    Reply
  3. marketing really got luke in a chokehold this year. the "new" cyberpunk is still nowhere close to advertised and is a glorified patch update that they're charging you for. Meanwhile starfield is getting crucified over hype that you helped perpetuate. be serious.

    Reply
  4. Cyberpunk is one of the craziest games I’ve ever played from the writing to the character to the setting and the combat shits wild af yeah should have launched recently not 3 years ago but you guys gota get over it just go buy PL so they will make a gta online of cyberpunk and CDPR can cover off some of that lawsuit cost. You guys are gonna make them not wanna make more DLC for the game just chill out and buy the new DLC its worth it

    Reply
  5. Everyone still hates on cyberpunk due to the launch even though it's the gaming communities fault that it launched that way due to them threatening to kill the devs and Investors every single day.

    Reply
  6. the thing is, as bad as it was at launch, the story/writing has always been great. So if you're a sucker for narative heavy games, it was already a good game at launch.

    Now they have the gameplay and polish to support the story.

    Reply
  7. I’ve personally got a ton of crashing issues when fast traveling to anywhere in the main part of night city and sometimes just generally being in the main part of Night City but once I narrow down what mod or whatever is causing it I think Cyberpunk is better right now, but mostly just because of how Bethesda does their weapons and especially uniques. Once mod support comes out and I can get my hands on weapons that feel more unique and interesting from the generally bland Bethesda made weapons I’ll probably enjoy Starfield a lot more, not that I’m not already enjoying Starfield but it’d be more fun with weapons that do more unique things and/or have recoil patterns that aren’t copied exactly from Fallout 4.

    Reply
  8. I’m just sad because when I played at release it had game breaking bugs. Keycards and quest item I needed would glitch out of the map. It’s sad i would have had to hold onto this game for 3 years for it to be worth playing

    Reply
  9. It didn't take three years. Took about six months to iron out the huge issues and most bugs. However it was still wrong to launch the game in that state, especially on consoles. Cyberpunk was totally playable on PC day one. It had issues but was overall just fine, no different than a standard Bethesda title. I played on three different PC machines. Additionally it was heavily patched within six months, and after edge runners 1.5 years after launch the game was totally playable and fine. Claiming three years is BS.

    Reply

Leave a Comment