"Starfield is more immersive than Cyberpunk 2077"



Read more about Cyberpunk 2077➜ https://cyberpunk2077.mgn.tv

If you like my videos Please subscribe.I appreciate all of you!

SUBSCRIBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TribbianiJoseph/videos
Backup channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwi62GG5EB3dglACZBiSl1A

#starfield #cyberpunk2077 #phantomliberty

source

50 thoughts on “"Starfield is more immersive than Cyberpunk 2077"”

  1. It's not even close. Cyberpunk is the best narrative 1st person experience out there.
    A game that might come close is Kingdom Come but it lacks the vibes Cyberpunk has going for it.

    Starfield looks exactly like Fallout 3 – 4 and skyrim with their presentation. It looks like a game made in 2005. Crazy actually xD

    Reply
  2. TLDR; Is the game worth buying now truly?

    Hi, if You're reading this. I've completely disregarded everything to do with Cyberpunk since it's initial release and I remember everyone said it was MEGA wonky. I decided to not play or pay attention to it. Now that it's updated, is it really worth it or should I wait for a sale of some kind?

    Reply
  3. I'm amaze that this is only from act 1, like it's not the even better cinematic from Phantom Liberty or the really emotional scene later in the game, it's act 1.

    Starfield suck and people that brag about it being better than Cyberpunk are delusional.

    Reply
  4. as someone who has 300 hours on cyberpunk, i can say it has its highs and lows. but damn those highs are excellence, an experience tailored to the minimum detail. the music, the lights, the espressions of bodies and faces, the world so vibrant around you. i still remember the day i fell in love with the game, the narrative during the konpeki plaza section, the raw emotions in those scenes.

    Reply
  5. This videos doesnt really actually show you much, but I gotta be honest with you. Everything I've seen from Starfield so far made me so happy to not have bought into it.

    Cyberpunk since day 1, 400+ hours and counting. Not a single regret!

    Reply
  6. I love both games especially CP2077 but people seem to be forgetting how terrible its launch was compared to Starfield right now. This is not a fair comparison, Cp2077 has improved immensely with updates over 3 years while Starfield just released. Just goes to show how fcked the gaming industry is, releasing games that are half baked and then update them later on

    Reply
  7. I hate how Starfield isn't any of what Todd promised us. It literally is a Fallout 4 Fan Fiction Mod that is still running on the 2003 Creation engine. That engine is why the AI just lines up to be shot down without using tactics. Why we have all the loading screens. Why this game doesn't feel innovative.

    Reply
  8. Give the devs a break at Starfield. They spend more time to focus on exploration, adding planets, ships and etc. I admit that it lacks what Cyberpunk has but cyberpunk focuses on a city while Starfield have to focus on many planets and add so many things. I am sure over each update it will get better.

    Reply
  9. I just love when I walk into Konpeki Plaza, they ask me why I'm carrying a combat robot and I just tell them "I'm an arms dealer". Because that's a totally legal occupation in 2077 🙂. Imagine doing that in real life…

    Reply
  10. The biggest problem with Cyberpunk is how the cinematics break the immersion often. Your V is equipped with Kerenzikov, Sandevistan and synaptic accelerator, meaning three superspeed failsafes and still gets shot or hit in cutscenes when it should be impossible.

    Reply
  11. Actually the first clip you showed was some of the most immersion starfield can off because the dude had a helmet on and you couldn’t see the embarrassing facial animations

    Reply
  12. Idea for the next Starfield vs Cyberpunk: The Interloper vs Militech Cerberus

    Starfield: The Interloper has great setup but terrible payoff. Since it always stops to melee, you can literally kite it around the ship while shooting at it.

    Cyberpunk: creepy af atmosphere and terrifying pay off. If the Cerberus finds you, you’re fucked. Your character build is useless here; being a no-ganic, full-borg powerhouse with preem gear and the best cyberware won’t save you.

    Reply
  13. Watches the tribal pissing contest while knowing that both games have their pros and cons.
    Even CDPR called this sort of thing stupid, You're comparing it's not even comparing apples to oranges anymore, You guys are comparing a grapefruit to a cabbage.

    Reply
  14. As much as I love the Fallout games, haven't played Starfield, waiting to get it on PC. I got late into Cyberpunk with ver 1.6, loved every minute of it. Bought Phantom Liberty and played the shit out of it and 2.0. Started a new character with 2.0 to get a fresh start and give the Militech Canto a real workout in the end instead of just the final mission. I will say this, I don't think I could enjoy another Fallout type NPC conversation with those awkwardly blank stares. Cyberpunk interactions all felt alive and full of emotion of all ranges, even better then Johnny is in the picture also.

    Reply
  15. I can already tell Cyberpunk will be considered ahead of its time in the future. I have yet to see another game that even comes close to matching the immersiveness and visual realism of cyberpunk. Aside from the human characters being a little uncanny looking, the game is a damn near perfect visual simulation of reality.

    Reply

Leave a Comment