Read more about Cyberpunk 2077➜ https://cyberpunk2077.mgn.tv
If you like my videos Please subscribe.I appreciate all of you!
SUBSCRIBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TribbianiJoseph/videos
Backup channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwi62GG5EB3dglACZBiSl1A
#starfield #cyberpunk2077 #phantomliberty
source
It's not even close. Cyberpunk is the best narrative 1st person experience out there.
A game that might come close is Kingdom Come but it lacks the vibes Cyberpunk has going for it.
Starfield looks exactly like Fallout 3 – 4 and skyrim with their presentation. It looks like a game made in 2005. Crazy actually xD
dramatic or nothing
Starfield looks like Cyberpunk but made by a shitty AI
Starfield is,
To quote Zapp Brannigan : Meek and uninspiring
To quote Zoidberg : Bland and tasteless
Include BG3 in this too for narrative and immersion, CP2077 and BG3 are streets ahead then the unwavering vapid eye contact of starfield.
Cyberpunk is way better.
Starfield looks and feels like it released 10yrs ago
Starefield more like
0:05 I doubt that a goon in Starfield punches you so hard that you call your car to your position.
TLDR; Is the game worth buying now truly?
Hi, if You're reading this. I've completely disregarded everything to do with Cyberpunk since it's initial release and I remember everyone said it was MEGA wonky. I decided to not play or pay attention to it. Now that it's updated, is it really worth it or should I wait for a sale of some kind?
Starfield is the best game of 2012
Cyberpunk oozes style and agressiveness everywhere while Starfueld is just too clean and sterile.
Cyberpunk pointing iron at Starfield's head:
"Bang"
Why is Starfield facial animation looks like Oblivion still? 2006 hello!?
Cyberpunk so good it made everybody forget all the "CDPR is DOOMED because of ESG" articles and videos.
Starfield is outrageously shit.
Cyberpunk is a masterpiece.
Do people actually say this though?
I'm amaze that this is only from act 1, like it's not the even better cinematic from Phantom Liberty or the really emotional scene later in the game, it's act 1.
Starfield suck and people that brag about it being better than Cyberpunk are delusional.
Starfields voice actors put more effort than their animators.
1:14 Bro’s neck not hurting 😂
as someone who has 300 hours on cyberpunk, i can say it has its highs and lows. but damn those highs are excellence, an experience tailored to the minimum detail. the music, the lights, the espressions of bodies and faces, the world so vibrant around you. i still remember the day i fell in love with the game, the narrative during the konpeki plaza section, the raw emotions in those scenes.
Well, look at that…
This videos doesnt really actually show you much, but I gotta be honest with you. Everything I've seen from Starfield so far made me so happy to not have bought into it.
Cyberpunk since day 1, 400+ hours and counting. Not a single regret!
I love both games especially CP2077 but people seem to be forgetting how terrible its launch was compared to Starfield right now. This is not a fair comparison, Cp2077 has improved immensely with updates over 3 years while Starfield just released. Just goes to show how fcked the gaming industry is, releasing games that are half baked and then update them later on
Just finished Phantom Liberty DLC for Cyberpunk 2077 and it's not even close. Starfield is a joke.
I hate how Starfield isn't any of what Todd promised us. It literally is a Fallout 4 Fan Fiction Mod that is still running on the 2003 Creation engine. That engine is why the AI just lines up to be shot down without using tactics. Why we have all the loading screens. Why this game doesn't feel innovative.
Cyberpunk is insanely boring as a universe, generic as all hell.
Who said such bullshit (video title)?
Cyberpunk is brutal, gritty, raw, cinematic and atmospheric. Nothing beats all that
"Starfield is more immersive than Cyberpunk 2077" who actually said this?
Its starfields aesthetic that is so f***ng boring.
The future of triple A game (Starfield) VS The game that everybody hate (Cyberpunk 2077)
Give the devs a break at Starfield. They spend more time to focus on exploration, adding planets, ships and etc. I admit that it lacks what Cyberpunk has but cyberpunk focuses on a city while Starfield have to focus on many planets and add so many things. I am sure over each update it will get better.
Starfield is by far and wide more immersive than cyberpunk. Cdpr put literally EVERYTHING into looks and combat. The storys cool too but cyberpunk is as empty of a game STILL as they come.
I just love when I walk into Konpeki Plaza, they ask me why I'm carrying a combat robot and I just tell them "I'm an arms dealer". Because that's a totally legal occupation in 2077 🙂. Imagine doing that in real life…
Different games 😅, starfield is sandbox style, gameplay over graphics, like minecraft, and cyberpunk, is more cinematic like the last of us or gow, where style is all.
The biggest problem with Cyberpunk is how the cinematics break the immersion often. Your V is equipped with Kerenzikov, Sandevistan and synaptic accelerator, meaning three superspeed failsafes and still gets shot or hit in cutscenes when it should be impossible.
I love the little touches that the characters do when you speak to them, they’re actually animated. Like characters that smoke will ash their cigarette every minute or so
Actually the first clip you showed was some of the most immersion starfield can off because the dude had a helmet on and you couldn’t see the embarrassing facial animations
Idea for the next Starfield vs Cyberpunk: The Interloper vs Militech Cerberus
Starfield: The Interloper has great setup but terrible payoff. Since it always stops to melee, you can literally kite it around the ship while shooting at it.
Cyberpunk: creepy af atmosphere and terrifying pay off. If the Cerberus finds you, you’re fucked. Your character build is useless here; being a no-ganic, full-borg powerhouse with preem gear and the best cyberware won’t save you.
正如華為遙遙領先apple一個道理
Watches the tribal pissing contest while knowing that both games have their pros and cons.
Even CDPR called this sort of thing stupid, You're comparing it's not even comparing apples to oranges anymore, You guys are comparing a grapefruit to a cabbage.
this statement is incorrect.
Funny how nobody gave a dime for Cyberpunk for like a year. And now it has became a trend to compare it with Starfield on its release.
cyberpunk at LAUNCH is more immersive than startrash
As much as I love the Fallout games, haven't played Starfield, waiting to get it on PC. I got late into Cyberpunk with ver 1.6, loved every minute of it. Bought Phantom Liberty and played the shit out of it and 2.0. Started a new character with 2.0 to get a fresh start and give the Militech Canto a real workout in the end instead of just the final mission. I will say this, I don't think I could enjoy another Fallout type NPC conversation with those awkwardly blank stares. Cyberpunk interactions all felt alive and full of emotion of all ranges, even better then Johnny is in the picture also.
Lol, how long did it take CDPR to deliver this? 😂 chill on the Starfield hate
I can already tell Cyberpunk will be considered ahead of its time in the future. I have yet to see another game that even comes close to matching the immersiveness and visual realism of cyberpunk. Aside from the human characters being a little uncanny looking, the game is a damn near perfect visual simulation of reality.
Gamers are unable to like any games without trashing another game, and it's depressing as hell