Cyberpunk 2077 Critique: It's No Witcher 3

by



Read more about Cyberpunk 2077➜ https://cyberpunk2077.mgn.tv

After an incredibly long wait period full of hype and awesome gameplay reveals, Cyberpunk 2077 released to not so critical reception. After 50 hours of playtime, I came to realize that Cyberpunk 2077 isn’t a bad game, but it’s certainly no Witcher 3.

Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/NopNapNarp

Time Stamps:

Intro: 00:00:00
World Building: 3:20
Main Story: 11:04
Side Missions: 32:51
Character Building & Role Playing: 50:44
Quest Design: 1:00:30
Dialogue & Writing: 1:05:14
Stealth, Combat, & Quickhacking: 1:08:03
Crafting & Upgrading: 1:20:29
Presentation & Performance: 1:23:42
Conclusion: 1:27:37

source

2 thoughts on “Cyberpunk 2077 Critique: It's No Witcher 3”

  2. I wouldn't say Cyberpunk is much like Bethesda/Fallout at all, more like Far Cry. Most of the basic mechanics, as well as the driving and mission structure, are exactly like the recent Far Cry games (IE boring as hel) to the point that I believe CDPR got so desperate to release the game they just copied most of it from the generic open-world formula we see from such games. PS, good video, but I think you need to find some music to put on in the background!

    Reply

Leave a Comment