"CDPR Committed To Fixing Cyberpunk 2077 They Can Be Proud Of" Promises CEO



Read more about Cyberpunk 2077➜ https://cyberpunk2077.mgn.tv

Yesterday, Adam Kiciński was interviewed by Reuters about the future of Cyberpunk 2077 and CD Projekt RED where he said that CDPR is committed to fix the game the way it should be. Here is also what I think about the situation and how can that reflect on CDPR moving forward.

TIMESTAMPS:
Intro: 00:0001:56
CDPR CEO Interview: 01:5710:52
CDPR Protecting Themselves From Takeover: 10:5311:50
Outro: 11:5112:22

FOLLOW ME ON:
●Twitter:
http://www.twitter.com/LastKnownMeal
●Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/LastKno
● Join my DISCORD server:
https://discord.com/invite/6kWpRAW
●Intro by MADQUEEN:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0G5rpOFcY6pOdtKsCE0p2A

Background music:
Epidemic Sound (Licensed)

Sources:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cdprojekt-poland-idUSKBN2BZ11I?taid=607425e4b509cb00014096f9&utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Trending+Content&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter

#Cyberpunk2077 #cdpr #cdprojektred

LastKnownMeal, 2021.

source

50 thoughts on “"CDPR Committed To Fixing Cyberpunk 2077 They Can Be Proud Of" Promises CEO”

  1. Oh yeah, let's praise a company for doing something they should've done before the game was released, CDPR shouldn't be praised as they are doing us no favour, every game should be released in a near perfect condition

    Reply
  2. I honestly hope CDPR can salvage their reputation.

    Mainly because I want any future Witcher games to be good, but CP77 has a lot of potential too and I had a great time with it despite its flaws.

    Reply
  3. I honestly hope CDPR can salvage their reputation.

    Mainly because I want any future Witcher games to be good, but CP77 has a lot of potential too and I had a great time with it despite its flaws.

    Reply
  4. I believe they will fix the game the best they can. That does NOT mean I believe they will put in every single feature that they hinted at since the game development began. Perhaps some. I'm still enjoying the game at the moment (PC of course).

    Reply
  5. Sony is just punishing CDPR now, above & beyond what is deserved. Black Tiger is still available for purchase & that game is complete shit. However, I'm waiting till I get a Series X before I re-buy Cyberpunk.

    Reply
  6. Patch 1.2 turned out lot better in terms of consistency in performance for my 1660ti laptop. Finally I'm able to pull off on an average 55 fps at High texture & LOD with rest settings set to low & screen space reflection turned off. Turning off screen space reflection instantly give like 5 to 7 fps bost and I still see pretty good reflection across the city, not sure if they implemented screen spaced reflections properly.

    Reply
  7. Lot more work req for
    -Better police system
    -Better NPC reaction who still end up doing squats 🙄 while in panic
    -Car handling still needs improvement
    -Car don't even move an inch in air on blowing it with grenade 🙄 This is super basic thing to be fixed
    -Accessibility of buildings
    -Bring back wall running from trailer

    Reply
  8. CDPR simply can't abandon the game. Cyberpunk 2077 IP is just as big as The Witcher imo, even though it's the first title & etc. The game literally about to have an anime slated next year.
    I think people distrustful & skeptical about everything that CDPR do right now is very understandable tbh. Let them have it. CDPR are the only ones that can prove them wrongs.

    Reply
  9. Unless they "No Man's Sky" it the thing still fails expectations of a cyberpunk RPG they themselves set. They can make it a Passable less buggy game, but the core of the thing is pure 2000`s Euro jank.
    It launched as a light unfinished version of itself and that's really disappointing.

    Reply
  10. CDPR is over rated by a lot. The Witcher sucked and CDPR said the series sold 50 million copies. Skyrim sold 50 million and it is one game in a series. Skyrim still has more people playing it today.

    When Far Cry 5 was announced people were saying, "My god, not another Far Cry". FC5 sold 25 million where the hyped game Witcher 3 sold 28 million. I own Witcher 3 and only played it for 10 hours because it sucks.

    I have played 2077 for 200 hours and am in the middle of my 3rd playthrough. I have had no game breaking bugs but I play it on PC. But as CDPR stated, This game was designed to run on PC and we have been cutting it down to run on consoles. We haven't cut enough yet. (Watched the video of this on Steam).

    While so called hardware reviewers brag about, "The power of the consoles" this game shows just how weak they are.

    Reply
  11. I love this game. I can see the hard work and love and art that they’ve put into it. It just fell a bit. I still have hope and I can’t wait to see the final product.

    Reply
  12. Even if cyberpunk succeeds people won't forget about how they were lied to and what they got on launch day.

    They lost the trust people had in their words 24 hours after the game came out. Its not something they'll ever get back unless they really have some major successes years removed from the mess of the CP2077 launch

    Reply
  13. Love that you are still covering this.

    Yeah; 1.2 put a lot of pep back in my step for CDPR; but they do need to follow through a lot more until their word is anything but words. I agree with you on analysis though. It would make no sense for them to abandon the game. Bioware did that with Andromeda and hasn't been doing well ever since. (incidentally by patch 10 the game was ok, there were still some problems like the story being kinda meh and the characters not being super well developed in some parts. But most of the graphical issues and design issues were hammered out.)

    CDPR is a game by game designer. Making one game at a time… if their last game is still seen as bad or incomplete… that's going to hurt their bottom line. And also C77 doesn't have the problems Andromeda had. At its core its an excellent story with excellent characters. It has a good selection of mechanics and customization, and an absolutely beautiful world. Unlike Andromeda what it needs is polish and refinement. Combat erred on the side of too easy, so AI needs tweaks to be a bit more challenging. Some perks need rebalancing, and some textures could afford some upgrade (though after the game runs properly on last gen tech.) Story and RP wise I think that there is a bit of a flaw that its a little too meant for tabletop fans. I think im quoting Madqueen "If you know the roles and history there are a lot of options that though not labeled a role response… are. This is how a corpo would respond, this is how a Nomad would respond." and that's not the kind of RP that the video gaming community is used to. And also the game relies on self moderation of events too much. It is nice that you can get most endings in a single play through; but with the length you had people playing through every possibility and going "Where's the choice!" Well the game is depending on you to have made those choices and to stop yourself from just gobbling them all up…. which was nice but in the words of many great men and women "Harder daddy!" CDPR really should have been more willing to say "nah, choices can lock you out of content.". Gamers of all stripes are at least a little masochistic even if we are playing on easy mode because we are too busy we like the game to challenge us.

    But these arent critical flaws. Im hoping one of the DLCs or expansions will be expanded tutorials. Make the life path sections longer so players have a stronger feel for what being a Corpo/Nomad/Streetkid is like. And then it can just be "Game isnt going to force or punish you into or out of most choices; so it's on you to decide why your V does or doesn't do something."

    I love the game, it has problems but for me I see a golden egg that CDPR dropped in the mud. With some elbow grease and cleaning; I think that the proverbial book will start with "CDPR believed they had an amazing game." and end with "And when all was said and done, and their labor on the game finished; they proved themselves right."

    Reply
  14. I think CDPR are mostly abandoning Cyberpunk. Shown by the fact they have totally backed away from the multiplayer game. They will do the minimum to get Cyberpunk back in store and performing OK on all systems. On the Witcher 3 GOTY cover it states it received 800 awards. Even if Cyberpunk was patched to be bug free, do you think it would win many awards? Do you think it is as good an RPG as Witcher 3 ? I really enjoyed Cyberpunk but it didn't feel like a game of the year award winning game. For me it was not RPG enough to be a special RPG, it is a totally unfinished GTA/far cry open world game and and it can't compete with the top class pure action games. For me, the main story is so linear that re-playing it does not hold my interest and the game world feels more like a static back drop so is very lonely to explore. I totally believe that CDPR are going to make it run at a decent frame rate on all systems and fix the majority of the bugs. But this won't make it a better game. It won't win any game of the year awards. Do you think they are actually going to invest the development resources to really revamp the game enough to make it a GOTY contender? Or do you think that they will just do the promised DLCs and focus their development efforts on Witcher 4? My local game shop has a crazy number of traded in copies of Cyberpunk – so it looks like many people have lost interest in the game. You didn't see that with Witcher 3. Personally I can't see an easy way of making Cyberpunk 2077 a GOTY contender. So I think CDPR will just do the minimum and leave Cyberpunk as their least critically acclaimed game so far. I can't see CDPR changing the story to add choice and consequence. I can't see that they will make the game world believable and reactive as they are struggling to get the PS4 and xbox one to just display the Night City graphics. I think we will have to wait for Cyberpunk 2 on the PS5 and xbox series X to get the reactive, alive feeling Night City that we wanted to immerse ourselves in and explore.

    Reply
  15. Whenever you plan something, it would be wise to never make any promises or else you are getting nowhere. This is what all videogame developers should realise right now.

    On a related note, other games like Resident Evil: Village are getting fanservice and merchandise even though they are not really out yet; I'm VERY sure that it is common sense to just create fanart of characters like Lady Dimitrescu LONG BEFORE the game could be released. But at least I could forgive CDPR for making Panam my perfect love.

    Reply
  16. Hello LKM…. been watching your vids for a while, long before CP2077 was released as I was watching the development and anticipating the release like everyone else. Here is a comment I left in response on a Bloomberg vid about the game and bad launch. I am calling it for what it is….

    People are dancing around calling out CDPR for what they actually did. It pains me to say this, but CDPR actually committed fraud on the public. CDPR is a company the promise a product with certain features, even if an entertainment product, that did not even work correctly when they were publicly advertising otherwise, let alone did not have a majority of the key features that were promised. That is a violation of truth in advertising if I am not mistaken.

    I am 52 , a longtime computer nerd having been online since almost the mid 80s. I also used to play table top RPGs with friends, although we were more into Shadowrun than Cyberpunk 2020 because it had elements of Cyberpunk and DnD together. I am not a major game player, but I do play some from time to time when I have nothing else to fill boring moments. When I really heard about Cyberpunk 2077 in early 2018, I was really excited for what this game could be from what I had learned up to that point, and that CDPR was the studio producing it, so odds were good that this game would be what was being presented.

    I know that games will release with some bugs, so any ones that I am interested in, I will wait a little bit after launch to understand what is going on and see how the publisher is correcting them with patches. I also understood delays prior to the initial launch of a game. Games are becoming much more sophisticate and complex pieces of programming that even if each dev does their part as best then can, they still have to get all the sections of code to work together at the same time.

    I had always been cautiously optimistic, but that was losing out to the hype being built up from all the promotional advertising and use of industry influence to push the believe in what this game is and was.

    As the date approached for the eventual release of CP2077, I started to notice things, some of which being pointed out by others as well, that indicated things were not all as being said. One of the biggest for me was the verbiage that was changed by CDPR themselves to describe this game in some of their online communications and website. Changing it from an RPG to an action-adventure game. That is a major change in description for those that understand. I was looking at CP2077 as being an RPG game i would be interested in, not just an action-adventure game. It was a basic 'canary in the coalmine' moment, that I took note of but held back, and continued with a 'well lets see what they actually do with it' mindset. The current game is barely shallow enough to be an RPG. That is a little depressing.

    Further more, some of the other big features, such as the enhance NPCs that would make this a believably realistic world, or the illusion of choices that actually matter throughout the game. Even the original backstory idea having an impact on your game is missing. Where is the choice where Jackie lives? Where are there having to be different solutions for certain situations because your character's lifepath will influence what they can do at a give n point of progression through the game further influenced by their acquired and developed skills?

    I could expand upon those questions to give a better understanding of how the RPG element is lacking, but this comment would be much longer and I think I have give enough of a basic example for understanding.

    Of course, for older gen console players, there is the greatly misleading phrase of that 'it plays surprisingly well' on previous gen consoles along with the highly controlled presentation of console footage that was released.

    If what other industry could a company do the same thing and not be accuse and found fraudulent for their actions?

    The things is, and I believe as some people pointed out, for the money that this game did make in the state it was released, other companies will take note and have no problems in doing the same things….if they can create a title big enough that they can hype the public for.

    CDPR needs to be held to account from what they have done and be made an example of for the other publishers out there.

    The only way CDPR is going to regain the public's trust is to release the gain that they had originally promised. Now that people are really supporting them to do this and they have the time to do it. I understand if some miscellaneous feature like wall running with the mantis blades is not possible….. that would be a nightmare logistically in a destructible world….. but they need to add the rest…. realistic crowds… fixed police that act like real police system would…. true RPG game play…..with choices that matter how the game is played throughout it….

    As for me… I have yet to buy this game. I have been watching YT video of some game play just to enjoy some of it. I still may get this game in the future, but probably not after it is greatly improved…..because if that is all that is done to it, then that would be the only reason for me still to consider purchasing this game.

    Reply
  17. I will believe it when i see it actions speak louder than words because all they do is lie they been lying about this game for years before it was released and if they can't keep there promise like they did before why should i believe them at all.

    Reply
  18. Reason was that it was too big project for such small company like CDP yet . They earn real money after Witcher 3 what allow them to grow and make too a lot mistakes in menagment of this project . They havent enough people and yet badly managed the project in addition they started marketing campaigns too early what make that pressure grow and grow . In reallity they started working on game much later than in marketing materials and not with enough people becouse whole time polish Witcher 3 too etc.

    Reply
  19. they have to fix the game to the state it was meant to be, not just a respectable one. It was promised as the next wonder of videogames. So if they dont fix it to "that" state, they can forget about me gettin another CDPR game.

    Reply
  20. The fact is delays only happen because companies announce release dates too early. All they had to do is not announce a release date until it was done as they once said. While story and gun play will always be subjective the issues with the game are all down to it being rushed out. Its so obvious at some point they intended to make it what they promised because if you look at the level of time and effort put into certain aspects of the game its undeniable rushing it out was not originally part of the plan. For example, you don't spend god knows how long making the interior of the cars look that detailed and recording real engine sounds from many real world cars if the original plan was to just make a cash grab. On top of that no company will admit problems to their customers and I don't need them too, all I expect is them to deliver mostly what they promised and a working product. I'm so glad I only picked up this game after the latest patch for £18.99, never got on the hype train and modded the game to fix some of the problems as I'm loving it, however I hope they do keep this promise to make it the best it can be but I'm not holding my breath.

    Reply

Leave a Comment